1
Chapter 18 – Deficit Finance
Public Economics
2
Introduction
? Besides taxation,the government’s other
major revenue source is borrowing.
? In this lesson,we will:
– Discuss problems with measuring size of
debt
– Who bears the burden of the debt
– When is borrowing a suitable way to finance
government expenditure
3
How Big is the Debt?
? Definitions:
– The deficit during a time period is the excess
of spending over revenues
– The surplus during a time period is the
excess of revenues over spending
? Some items are off-budget,like the
revenues and expenditures associated
with Social Security.
4
How Big is the Debt?
? Thus,one could modify the terms to:
– On-budget deficit (surplus)
– Off-budget deficit (surplus)
? In 2002,the on-budget deficit was $317.5
billion,while the off-budget surplus was
$159.6 billion,This gives a total deficit of
$157.8 billion.
5
How Big is the Debt?
? Table 18.1 shows the total federal budget
deficits (including off-budget items) for a
number of years
– Both in absolute size
– Relative to GDP
Table 18.1
7
How Big is the Debt?
? Deficits have generally been the rule
(although there was a surplus from 1998
to 2001).
? Deficit (as fraction of GDP) was highest in
mid-1980s.
8
How Big is the Debt?
? The debt at a given time is the sum of all
past budget deficits.
– Cumulative excess of past spending over
past receipts.
– When there is a deficit,debt goes up; when
there is a surplus,debt goes down.
– Debt is stock variable,while deficit and
surplus are flow variables
9
How Big is the Debt?
? Federal debt at end of 2002 was:
$3,500,000,000,000
? That is,3.5 trillion dollars.
10
How Big is the Debt?
? Putting the debt in perspective
– The $3.5 trillion debt was about 34% of GDP in 2002
– It has always been a large share of current GDP
? See Table 18.2
? Servicing the debt comprised 8.5% of federal
outlays in 2002.
Table 18.2
12
Interpreting the Numbers
? The numbers above are clearly politically
important.
? A key problem is that the numbers above
are probably not economically meaningful.
13
Interpreting the Numbers
? Government Debt Held by the Federal
Reserve Bank
– FRB held $604 billion in government
securities in 2002,This is counted as debt.
? State and Local Government Debt
– State and local debt was $1.37 trillion in
1999
14
Interpreting the Numbers
? Inflation
– When prices change,so does the real value
of the debt.
– In 2002,the debt was $3.5 trillion,and
inflation was 1.4%,Thus inflation reduced
the real value of the federal debt by $49
billion (=$3.5 trillion x 0.014)
– This should be considered a receipt as a tax
would.
15
Interpreting the Numbers
? Inflation
– The measured total deficit would therefore
fall from $158 billion to $109 billion,but
government accounting rules do not allow
the inclusion of gains due to inflationary
erosion.
16
Interpreting the Numbers
? Capital versus current accounting
– Current spending refers to expenditures that
are consumed during the year
– Capital spending refers to expenditures for
durable items such as dams,radar stations,
and aircraft carriers.
? $2.1 trillion stock of capital
– All items are lumped together in budget
17
Interpreting the Numbers
? Standard accounting procedure for many
businesses and state/local governments
is to keep separate budgets.
? In absence of capital budgeting,some
unusual government decisions,like
selling government assets to the private
sector and claiming deficit is falling.
18
Interpreting the Numbers
? Tangible Assets
– Are omitted,and paints a misleading picture
of the government’s financial position
– Government owns:
? Residential and non-residential buildings
? Equipment
? Gold
? Mineral rights
19
Interpreting the Numbers
? Implicit obligations
– Future Social Security and Medicare promises that
must be paid out of future tax revenue
– Social Security’s unfunded future liability is $9 trillion,
and Medicare’s is $6 trillion
– Federal pensions
? These could potentially be reduced by
legislative action in future (unlikely).
20
Interpreting the Numbers
? Thus,the debt depends on which assets
and liabilities are included in the
calculation,and how they are valued.
21
The Burden of Debt
? Why should we care about whether the national
debt is increasing or decreasing?
– Future generations have to retire the debt or
refinance it
– Theory of incidence tells us that statutory incidence
may not match the economic incidence
? Answer depends on assumptions about
economic behavior
22
The Burden of Debt
? Old school view
? Internal debt is when the government borrows
from its own citizens.
– Lerner (1948) argues that internal debt creates no
burden for the future generation.
? External debt is when the government borrows
from abroad.
– In this case,future generations do bear a burden.
23
The Burden of Debt:
OLG
? More modern view
? Overlapping generations model –
several generations exist simultaneously
? Used to show how burden of debt can be
transferred across generations
24
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? 3 equal sized generations
– Young,middle-aged,and old
– Each person has fixed income of $12,000
– 20 year horizon
? Table 18.3 shows this (row 1)
Table 18.3
26
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Government borrows $12,000 to finance
public consumption in 2004.
? Loan repaid in 2024 – only young and
middle aged willing to loan to government
because old will not be alive to get repaid.
? Half of lending done by young group,half
by middle aged group (row 2).
27
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Each group benefits from the government
consumption -- $4,000 (row 3).
? By 2024,the old have died,the middle-aged are
now old,and the young are now middle-aged,
There is also a new young generation.
? Government must raise $12,000 to pay off debt,
Levy $4,000 tax per group (row 4).
28
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? With these tax receipts in 2024,
government pays off its debt-holders,the
current middle-aged and old (line 5).
? Thus,we can now compute the incidence
for different groups from Table 18.3
29
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Elderly in 2004 had lifetime consumption
that was $4,000 higher than it otherwise
would have.
? Middle-aged and young in 2004 are no
better off (or worse off).
? Young in 2024 has a lifetime
consumption that was $4,000 lower than
it otherwise would have.
30
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Implicitly,transfer from the young of 2024 to the
old of 2004.
? Young in 2024 are at the short end of the
transfer because they have to contribute to
repaying a debt from which they never
benefited.
? Even though all the debt was internal,it creates
a burden for the future generation.
31
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Generational accounting is a framework
for comparing the effects of fiscal policies
across generations.
– Take representative person in each
generation,compute present value of all
taxes paid.
– Compute present value of transfers received
from Social Security,Medicare,etc.
– Difference is the,net tax.”
32
The Burden of Debt:
Neoclassical Model
? Models so far do not allow for economic
decisions to be affected by government
debt policy.
? For example,policies neither affect work,
saving,or capital formation.
? Neoclassical model of the debt stresses
that government borrowing crowds out
investment in the private sector.
33
The Burden of Debt:
Neoclassical Model
? As a consequence,debt finance leaves
future generations with a smaller capital
stock.
– Its members are therefore less productive
and have smaller real incomes.
? Assumption that government borrowing
reduces private investment is referred to
as the crowding out hypothesis.
34
The Burden of Debt:
Neoclassical Model
? As a consequence,debt finance leaves
future generations with a smaller capital
stock.
– Its members are therefore less productive
and have smaller real incomes.
? Assumption that government borrowing
reduces private investment is referred to
as the crowding out hypothesis.
35
The Burden of Debt:
Ricardian Model
? All of the previous discussion ignores
individual’s intentional transfers across
generations.
– Barro (1974) argued that when the government
borrows,members of the,old” generation realize
their heirs will be made worse off,If the,old”
increase their bequests by the tax burden on the
“young,” they can undo the government transfer.
– In Figure 18.3,the old generation of 2004 saves
$4,000 to give to the young of 2024.
36
The Burden of Debt:
Ricardian Model
? The conclusion of this model is that tax
and debt finance are essentially
equivalent; form of government finance is
irrelevant.
37
To Tax or Borrow?
? Benefits-received principle states that the
beneficiaries of a particular spending
program should have to pay for it.
? Intergeneration equity states that if
younger generations will be richer
because of technological progress,
should transfer from them.
38
To Tax or Borrow?
? Efficiency considerations states that the
decision to tax or borrow should be based on
excess burden calculations.
– Taxing versus borrowing is simply a question about
the timing of taxes – one large payment (current tax)
versus numerous smaller payments (borrowing)
– Excess burden formula says that excess burden
increases with the square of the tax rate,so many
smaller tax payments are preferred
? See Figure 18.1
Figure 18.1
40
To Tax or Borrow?
? The implication is that debt finance,which
results in a series of relatively small tax
rates,is superior to tax finance on
efficiency grounds.
? Ignores effect on capital stock.
41
Recap of Deficit Finance
? How Big is the Debt
? Interpreting the Numbers
? Burden of Debt
? To Tax or Borrow?
Chapter 18 – Deficit Finance
Public Economics
2
Introduction
? Besides taxation,the government’s other
major revenue source is borrowing.
? In this lesson,we will:
– Discuss problems with measuring size of
debt
– Who bears the burden of the debt
– When is borrowing a suitable way to finance
government expenditure
3
How Big is the Debt?
? Definitions:
– The deficit during a time period is the excess
of spending over revenues
– The surplus during a time period is the
excess of revenues over spending
? Some items are off-budget,like the
revenues and expenditures associated
with Social Security.
4
How Big is the Debt?
? Thus,one could modify the terms to:
– On-budget deficit (surplus)
– Off-budget deficit (surplus)
? In 2002,the on-budget deficit was $317.5
billion,while the off-budget surplus was
$159.6 billion,This gives a total deficit of
$157.8 billion.
5
How Big is the Debt?
? Table 18.1 shows the total federal budget
deficits (including off-budget items) for a
number of years
– Both in absolute size
– Relative to GDP
Table 18.1
7
How Big is the Debt?
? Deficits have generally been the rule
(although there was a surplus from 1998
to 2001).
? Deficit (as fraction of GDP) was highest in
mid-1980s.
8
How Big is the Debt?
? The debt at a given time is the sum of all
past budget deficits.
– Cumulative excess of past spending over
past receipts.
– When there is a deficit,debt goes up; when
there is a surplus,debt goes down.
– Debt is stock variable,while deficit and
surplus are flow variables
9
How Big is the Debt?
? Federal debt at end of 2002 was:
$3,500,000,000,000
? That is,3.5 trillion dollars.
10
How Big is the Debt?
? Putting the debt in perspective
– The $3.5 trillion debt was about 34% of GDP in 2002
– It has always been a large share of current GDP
? See Table 18.2
? Servicing the debt comprised 8.5% of federal
outlays in 2002.
Table 18.2
12
Interpreting the Numbers
? The numbers above are clearly politically
important.
? A key problem is that the numbers above
are probably not economically meaningful.
13
Interpreting the Numbers
? Government Debt Held by the Federal
Reserve Bank
– FRB held $604 billion in government
securities in 2002,This is counted as debt.
? State and Local Government Debt
– State and local debt was $1.37 trillion in
1999
14
Interpreting the Numbers
? Inflation
– When prices change,so does the real value
of the debt.
– In 2002,the debt was $3.5 trillion,and
inflation was 1.4%,Thus inflation reduced
the real value of the federal debt by $49
billion (=$3.5 trillion x 0.014)
– This should be considered a receipt as a tax
would.
15
Interpreting the Numbers
? Inflation
– The measured total deficit would therefore
fall from $158 billion to $109 billion,but
government accounting rules do not allow
the inclusion of gains due to inflationary
erosion.
16
Interpreting the Numbers
? Capital versus current accounting
– Current spending refers to expenditures that
are consumed during the year
– Capital spending refers to expenditures for
durable items such as dams,radar stations,
and aircraft carriers.
? $2.1 trillion stock of capital
– All items are lumped together in budget
17
Interpreting the Numbers
? Standard accounting procedure for many
businesses and state/local governments
is to keep separate budgets.
? In absence of capital budgeting,some
unusual government decisions,like
selling government assets to the private
sector and claiming deficit is falling.
18
Interpreting the Numbers
? Tangible Assets
– Are omitted,and paints a misleading picture
of the government’s financial position
– Government owns:
? Residential and non-residential buildings
? Equipment
? Gold
? Mineral rights
19
Interpreting the Numbers
? Implicit obligations
– Future Social Security and Medicare promises that
must be paid out of future tax revenue
– Social Security’s unfunded future liability is $9 trillion,
and Medicare’s is $6 trillion
– Federal pensions
? These could potentially be reduced by
legislative action in future (unlikely).
20
Interpreting the Numbers
? Thus,the debt depends on which assets
and liabilities are included in the
calculation,and how they are valued.
21
The Burden of Debt
? Why should we care about whether the national
debt is increasing or decreasing?
– Future generations have to retire the debt or
refinance it
– Theory of incidence tells us that statutory incidence
may not match the economic incidence
? Answer depends on assumptions about
economic behavior
22
The Burden of Debt
? Old school view
? Internal debt is when the government borrows
from its own citizens.
– Lerner (1948) argues that internal debt creates no
burden for the future generation.
? External debt is when the government borrows
from abroad.
– In this case,future generations do bear a burden.
23
The Burden of Debt:
OLG
? More modern view
? Overlapping generations model –
several generations exist simultaneously
? Used to show how burden of debt can be
transferred across generations
24
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? 3 equal sized generations
– Young,middle-aged,and old
– Each person has fixed income of $12,000
– 20 year horizon
? Table 18.3 shows this (row 1)
Table 18.3
26
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Government borrows $12,000 to finance
public consumption in 2004.
? Loan repaid in 2024 – only young and
middle aged willing to loan to government
because old will not be alive to get repaid.
? Half of lending done by young group,half
by middle aged group (row 2).
27
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Each group benefits from the government
consumption -- $4,000 (row 3).
? By 2024,the old have died,the middle-aged are
now old,and the young are now middle-aged,
There is also a new young generation.
? Government must raise $12,000 to pay off debt,
Levy $4,000 tax per group (row 4).
28
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? With these tax receipts in 2024,
government pays off its debt-holders,the
current middle-aged and old (line 5).
? Thus,we can now compute the incidence
for different groups from Table 18.3
29
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Elderly in 2004 had lifetime consumption
that was $4,000 higher than it otherwise
would have.
? Middle-aged and young in 2004 are no
better off (or worse off).
? Young in 2024 has a lifetime
consumption that was $4,000 lower than
it otherwise would have.
30
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Implicitly,transfer from the young of 2024 to the
old of 2004.
? Young in 2024 are at the short end of the
transfer because they have to contribute to
repaying a debt from which they never
benefited.
? Even though all the debt was internal,it creates
a burden for the future generation.
31
The Burden of Debt:
OLG Example
? Generational accounting is a framework
for comparing the effects of fiscal policies
across generations.
– Take representative person in each
generation,compute present value of all
taxes paid.
– Compute present value of transfers received
from Social Security,Medicare,etc.
– Difference is the,net tax.”
32
The Burden of Debt:
Neoclassical Model
? Models so far do not allow for economic
decisions to be affected by government
debt policy.
? For example,policies neither affect work,
saving,or capital formation.
? Neoclassical model of the debt stresses
that government borrowing crowds out
investment in the private sector.
33
The Burden of Debt:
Neoclassical Model
? As a consequence,debt finance leaves
future generations with a smaller capital
stock.
– Its members are therefore less productive
and have smaller real incomes.
? Assumption that government borrowing
reduces private investment is referred to
as the crowding out hypothesis.
34
The Burden of Debt:
Neoclassical Model
? As a consequence,debt finance leaves
future generations with a smaller capital
stock.
– Its members are therefore less productive
and have smaller real incomes.
? Assumption that government borrowing
reduces private investment is referred to
as the crowding out hypothesis.
35
The Burden of Debt:
Ricardian Model
? All of the previous discussion ignores
individual’s intentional transfers across
generations.
– Barro (1974) argued that when the government
borrows,members of the,old” generation realize
their heirs will be made worse off,If the,old”
increase their bequests by the tax burden on the
“young,” they can undo the government transfer.
– In Figure 18.3,the old generation of 2004 saves
$4,000 to give to the young of 2024.
36
The Burden of Debt:
Ricardian Model
? The conclusion of this model is that tax
and debt finance are essentially
equivalent; form of government finance is
irrelevant.
37
To Tax or Borrow?
? Benefits-received principle states that the
beneficiaries of a particular spending
program should have to pay for it.
? Intergeneration equity states that if
younger generations will be richer
because of technological progress,
should transfer from them.
38
To Tax or Borrow?
? Efficiency considerations states that the
decision to tax or borrow should be based on
excess burden calculations.
– Taxing versus borrowing is simply a question about
the timing of taxes – one large payment (current tax)
versus numerous smaller payments (borrowing)
– Excess burden formula says that excess burden
increases with the square of the tax rate,so many
smaller tax payments are preferred
? See Figure 18.1
Figure 18.1
40
To Tax or Borrow?
? The implication is that debt finance,which
results in a series of relatively small tax
rates,is superior to tax finance on
efficiency grounds.
? Ignores effect on capital stock.
41
Recap of Deficit Finance
? How Big is the Debt
? Interpreting the Numbers
? Burden of Debt
? To Tax or Borrow?
