Lectures 29-30:
?Phase
?Lod scores
Statistical Evaluation of
Genetic Linkage
20 cM
SSR12 SSR112 SSR31 SSR37 SSR5
genetic linkage mapping
We genotype the six members of the family for SSRs scattered throughout
the genome (which spans 3300 cM)—
one SSR must be within 10 cM of the
Huntington's gene:
HD ?
log
10
(0.024/0.0039)
Same for families #2 and #3:
LOD
0.06
(families 1, 2, 3) =
3 x 0.796 = 2.388
Family #4:
DDDDSSR37
HD+HDHDHDMaternal
alleles
P if linked at 0.06 =
1/2 (P if phase 1) + 1/2 (P if phase 2)
= 1/2
LOD
0.06
(family 4)
LOD
0.06
(family 1) = = log
10
(6.25) = 0.796
(0.47 = 0.0016x 0.47 x 0.47)x 0.03 + 1/2 (0.03 x 0.03 x 0.47 x 0.03)
= log
10
(0.41)= log
10
(0.0016/0.0039) = - 0.387
LOD
0.06
(families 1, 2, 3, 4) = 2.388 – 0.387 = 2.001
Still not sufficient to publish. What to do?
1. It's tempting to ignore family 4 —
But this would not be an acceptable solution.
2.
Calculate LOD scores for other values?
to declare it to be irrelevant for some
reason or another.
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
LOD
3.
4.
Get more families — always a good idea
Determine phase in affected parents
In each of the four families, we were uncertain about phase, and our
LOD calculations embodied those uncertainties.
Family #4:
D+
BHD
Phase
2:
B+
DHD
Phase
1:
SSR37HD
two possible arrangements of alleles
on mother's chromosomes
Typing the maternal grandparents for SSR37:
D
SSR37
E
C
B
A
Now we can deduce the
phase in the mother:
Family #4:
D+
BHD
Phase 2:
B+
DHD
Phase 1:
SSR37HDLocus:
Here is a more realistic version of the genotypic information we might obtain:
D
SSR37
E
C
B
A
Family #4:
dead
refused consent
or
inferred
Before we had written:
P if linked at 0.06 =
1/2 (P if phase 1) + 1/2 (P if phase 2)
= 1/2 (0.47 x 0.47 x 0.03 x 0.47) + 1/2 (0.03 x 0.03 x 0.47 x 0.03) = 0.0016
But we now know that
P if linked at 0.06 =
1/2 (P if phase 1) + 1/2 (P if phase 2)
= 1/2 (0.47 x 0.47 x 0.03 x 0.47) + 1/2 (0.03 x 0.03 x 0.47 x 0.03) = 0.0032
LOD
0.06
(family 4)
We can sum the LOD
0.06
scores for all four families:
LOD
0.06
(family 1, 2, 3, 4) =
phase 1 was correct:
= log
10
(0.82)= log
10
(0.0032/0.0039) = - 0.086
– 0.0862.388 = 2.302
phase known
Overall effect of determining phase in all four families:
LOD
0.06
(families 1,2,3,4: all phased) =
LOD
0.06
(families 1,2,3,4: unphased) + 4 log
10
(2)
= 2.001
What if we had not been able to obtain samples from any grandparents?
Try more markers
Publish!
Add increment of log
10
(2) = 0.301 to each family’s LOD score.
= 3.205 + 4 (0.301)
20 cM
SSR34 SSR35 SSR36 SSR37 SSR38
Chr 4
or
HD
Marker showing no recombination with HD
LOD
0
(families 1,2,3,4: unphased) = 4 x 0.903
Very strong conclusion!!
= 3.609
Search for SSR marker showing no recombination with HD: Where to look?