Chapter 20
Optimum Currency Areas and the European
Experience
Slide 20-2Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Chapter Organization
How the European Single Currency Evolved
The Euro and Economic Policy in the Euro Zone
The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas
The Future of EMU
Summary
Slide 20-3Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Introduction
European Union countries have progressively narrowed
the fluctuations of their currencies against each other.
This culminated in the birth of the euro on January 1,
1999,
This chapter focuses on the following questions:
How and why did Europe set up its single currency?
Will the euro be good for the economies of its members?
How will the euro affect countries outside of the
European Monetary Union (EMU)?
What lessons does the European experience carry for
other potential currency blocks?
Slide 20-4Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Introduction
Figure 20-1,Members of the Euro Zone as of January 1,2001
Slide 20-5Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Table 20-1,A Brief Glossary of Euronyms
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-6Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
European Currency Reform Initiatives,1969-1978
The Werner report (1969)
– It set out a blueprint for the stage-by-stage realization of
Economic and Monetary Union by proposing a three-
phase program to:
– Eliminate intra-European exchange rate movements
– Centralize EU monetary policy decisions
– Lower remaining trade barriers within Europe
Two major reasons for adopting the Euro:
– To enhance Europe’s role in the world monetary system
– To turn the European Union into a truly unified market
Slide 20-7Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The European Monetary System,1979-1998
Germany,the Netherlands,Belgium,Luxemburg,
France,Italy,and Britain participated in an informal
joint float against the dollar known as the,snake.”
– Most exchange rates could fluctuate up or down by as
much as 2.25% relative to an assigned par value.
– The snake served as a prologue to the more
comprehensive European Monetary System (EMS).
Eight original participants in the EMS’s exchange rate
mechanism began operating a formal network of
mutually pegged exchange rates in March 1979.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-8Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Capital controls and frequent realignments were
essential ingredients in maintaining the system until
the mid-1980s.
– After the mid-1980s,these controls have been abolished
as part of the EU’s wider,1992” program of market
unification,
During the currency crisis that broke out in September
1992,Britain and Italy allowed their currencies to float.
In August 1993 most EMS currency bands were
widened to ± 15% in the face of continuing
speculative attacks.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-9Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
German Monetary Dominance and the Credibility
Theory of the EMS
Germany has low inflation and an independent central
bank.
– It also has the reputation for tough anti-inflation policies.
Credibility theory of the EMS
– By fixing their currencies to the DM,the other EMS
countries in effect imported the German Bundesbank’s
credibility as an inflation fighter.
– Inflation rates in EMS countries tended to converge
around Germany’s generally low inflation rate.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-10Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Figure 20-2,Inflation Convergence Within Six Original EMS Members,
1978-2000
Slide 20-11Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The EU,1992” Initiative
The EU countries have tried to achieve greater internal
economic unity by:
– Fixing mutual exchange rates
– Direct measures to encourage the free flow of goods,
services,and factors of production
The process of market unification began when the original
EU members formed their customs union in 1957.
The Single European Act of 1986 provided for a free
movement of people,goods,services,and capital and
established many new policies.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-12Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
European Economic and Monetary Union
In 1989,the Delors report laid the foundations for the
single currency,the euro.
Economic and monetary union (EMU)
– A European Union in which national currencies are
replaced by a single EU currency managed by a sole
central bank that operates on behalf of all EU members.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-13Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Three stages of the Delors plan:
– All EU members were to join the EMS exchange rate
mechanism (ERM)
– Exchange rate margins were to be narrowed and certain
macroeconomic policy decisions placed under more
centralized EU control
– Replacement of national currencies by a single
European currency and vesting all monetary policy
decisions in a ESCB
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-14Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Maastricht Treaty (1991)
– It set out a blueprint for the transition process from the
EMS fixed exchange rate system to EMU.
– It specified a set of macroeconomic convergence criteria
that EU countries need to satisfy for admission to EMU.
– It included steps toward harmonizing social policy
within the EU and toward centralizing foreign and
defense policy decision.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-15Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
EU countries moved away from the EMS and toward
the single shared currency for four reasons:
– Greater degree of European market integration
– Same opportunity as Germany to participate in system-
wide monetary decisions
– Complete freedom of capital movements
– Political stability of Europe
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-16Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
The Maastricht Convergence Criteria and the
Stability and Growth Pact
The Maastricht Treaty specifies that EU member
countries must satisfy several convergence criteria:
– Price stability
– Maximum inflation rate 1.5% above the average of the three
EU member states with lowest inflation
– Exchange rate stability
– Stable exchange rate within the ERM without devaluing on its
own initiative
– Budget discipline
– Maximum public-sector deficit 3% of the country’s GDP
– Maximum public debt 60% of the country’s GDP
Slide 20-17Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Figure 20-3,Behavior of the Euro’s Exchange Rates
Against Major Currencies
Slide 20-18Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
A Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) in 1997 sets up:
– The medium-term budgetary objective of positions close
to balance or in surplus
– A timetable for the imposition of financial penalties on
counties that fail to correct situations of,excessive”
deficits and debt promptly enough
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-19Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The European System of Central Banks
It consists of the European Central Bank in Frankfurt
plus 12 national central banks.
It conducts monetary policy for the euro zone.
It is dependent on politicians in two respects:
– The ESCB’s members are political appointments.
– The Maastricht Treaty leaves exchange rate policy for
the euro zone ultimately in the hands of the political
authorities.
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-20Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Revised Exchange Rate Mechanism
It defines broad exchange rate zones for EU countries
that are not yet members of EMU against the euro,
– It specifies reciprocal intervention arrangements to
support these target zones.
– It is referred to as ERM 2.
It was viewed necessary in order to,
– Discourage competitive devaluations against the euro by
EU members outside the euro zone
– Give would-be EMU entrants a way of satisfying the
exchange rate stability convergence criterion
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-21Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Theory of optimum currency areas
It predicts that fixed exchange rates are most
appropriate for areas closely integrated through
international trade and factor movements.
Slide 20-22Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Economic Integration and the Benefits of a Fixed
Exchange Rate Area,GG Schedule
Monetary efficiency gain
– The joiner’s saving from avoiding the uncertainty,
confusion,and calculation and transaction costs that arise
when exchange rates float,
– It is higher,the higher the degree of economic integration
between the joining country and the fixed exchange rate
area.
GG schedule
– It shows how the potential gain of a country from joining
the euro zone depends on its trading link with that region.
– It slopes upward.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-23Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-4,The GG Schedule
Degree of economic integration between the
joining country and the exchange rate area
Monetary efficiency
gain for the joining country
GG
Slide 20-24Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Economic Integration and the Costs of a Fixed Exchange
Rate Area,The LL Schedule
Economic stability loss
– The economic stability loss that arises because a country that
joins an exchange rate area gives up its ability to use the
exchange rate and monetary policy for the purpose of
stabilizing output and employment.
– It is lower,the higher the degree of economic integration
between a country and the fixed exchange rate area that it joins.
LL schedule
– It shows the relationship of the country’s economic stability
loss from joining.
– It slopes downward.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-25Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-5,The LL Schedule
Degree of economic integration between the
joining country and the exchange rate area
Economic stability
loss for the joining country
LL
Slide 20-26Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Decision to Join a Currency Area,Putting the
GG and LL Schedules Together
The intersection of GG and LL
– Determines a critical level of economic integration
between a fixed exchange rate area and a country
– Shows how a country should decide whether to fix its
currency’s exchange rate against the euro
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-27Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-6,Deciding When to Peg the Exchange Rate
Degree of economic integration
between the joining country and
the exchange rate area
Gains and losses
for the joining country
LL
GG
Gains exceed
losses
Losses exceed
gains
1
1
Slide 20-28Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The GG-LL framework can be used to examine how
changes in a country’s economic environment affect
its willingness to peg its currency to an outside
currency area.
Figure 20-7 illustrates an increase in the size and
frequency of sudden shifts in the demand for the
country’s exports.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-29Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-7,An Increase in Output Market Variability
LL1
GG
LL2
2
2 Degree of economic integration
between the joining country and
the exchange rate area
Gains and losses
for the joining country
1
1
Slide 20-30Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
What Is an Optimum Currency Area?
It is a region where it is best (optimal) to have a single
currency.
Optimality depends on degree of economic integration:
– Trade in goods and services
– Factor mobility
A fixed exchange rate area will best serve the
economic interests of each of its members if the degree
of output and factor trade among them is high.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-31Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-8,Intra-EU Trade as a Percent of EU GDP
Slide 20-32Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Table 20-2,People Changing Region of Residence in 1986
(percent of total population)
B r i t a i n Fra n c e G e r m a n y I t a l y J a p a n U n i t e d S t a t e s
1,1 1,3 1,1 0,6 2,6 3,0
S o u r c e,O r g a n i z a t i o n f o r E c o n o m i c C o o p e r a t i o n a n d D e v e l o p m e n t,O E C D E m p l o y m e n t O u t l o o k,P a r i s,O E C D,
J u l y 1 9 9 0,T a b l e 3,3,
Slide 20-33Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Case Study,Is Europe an Optimum Currency
Area?
Europe is not an optimum currency area:
– Most EU countries export form 10% to 20% of their
output to other EU countries.
– EU-U.S,trade is only 2% of U.S,GNP.
– Labor is much more mobile within the U.S,than within
Europe.
– Federal transfers and changes in federal tax payments
provide a much bigger cushion for region-specific
shocks in the U.S,than do EU revenues and
expenditures.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-34Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-9,Divergent Inflation in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-35Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Future of EMU
If EMU succeeds it will promote European political as
well as economic integration.
If EMU fails the goal of European political unification
will be set back.
Problems that the EMU will face in the coming years:
Europe is not an optimum currency area.
Economic union is so far in front of political union.
EU labor markets are very rigid.
SGP constrains fiscal policies.
Slide 20-36Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Summary
Fixed exchange rates in Europe were a by-product of
the Bretton Woods system.
The EMS of fixed intra-EU exchange rates was
inaugurated in March 1979.
In practice all EMS currencies were pegged to the
DM.
On January 1,1999,11 EU countries initiated an
EMU by adopting a common currency,the euro.
Greece became the 12th member two years later.
Slide 20-37Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Summary
The Maastricht Treaty specified a set of
macroeconomic convergence criteria that EU countries
would need to satisfy to qualify for admission to EMU.
The theory of optimum currency areas implies that
countries will wish to join fixed exchange rate areas
closely linked to their own economies through trade and
factor mobility.
The EU does not appear to satisfy all of the criteria for
an optimum currency area.
Optimum Currency Areas and the European
Experience
Slide 20-2Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Chapter Organization
How the European Single Currency Evolved
The Euro and Economic Policy in the Euro Zone
The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas
The Future of EMU
Summary
Slide 20-3Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Introduction
European Union countries have progressively narrowed
the fluctuations of their currencies against each other.
This culminated in the birth of the euro on January 1,
1999,
This chapter focuses on the following questions:
How and why did Europe set up its single currency?
Will the euro be good for the economies of its members?
How will the euro affect countries outside of the
European Monetary Union (EMU)?
What lessons does the European experience carry for
other potential currency blocks?
Slide 20-4Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Introduction
Figure 20-1,Members of the Euro Zone as of January 1,2001
Slide 20-5Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Table 20-1,A Brief Glossary of Euronyms
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-6Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
European Currency Reform Initiatives,1969-1978
The Werner report (1969)
– It set out a blueprint for the stage-by-stage realization of
Economic and Monetary Union by proposing a three-
phase program to:
– Eliminate intra-European exchange rate movements
– Centralize EU monetary policy decisions
– Lower remaining trade barriers within Europe
Two major reasons for adopting the Euro:
– To enhance Europe’s role in the world monetary system
– To turn the European Union into a truly unified market
Slide 20-7Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The European Monetary System,1979-1998
Germany,the Netherlands,Belgium,Luxemburg,
France,Italy,and Britain participated in an informal
joint float against the dollar known as the,snake.”
– Most exchange rates could fluctuate up or down by as
much as 2.25% relative to an assigned par value.
– The snake served as a prologue to the more
comprehensive European Monetary System (EMS).
Eight original participants in the EMS’s exchange rate
mechanism began operating a formal network of
mutually pegged exchange rates in March 1979.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-8Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Capital controls and frequent realignments were
essential ingredients in maintaining the system until
the mid-1980s.
– After the mid-1980s,these controls have been abolished
as part of the EU’s wider,1992” program of market
unification,
During the currency crisis that broke out in September
1992,Britain and Italy allowed their currencies to float.
In August 1993 most EMS currency bands were
widened to ± 15% in the face of continuing
speculative attacks.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-9Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
German Monetary Dominance and the Credibility
Theory of the EMS
Germany has low inflation and an independent central
bank.
– It also has the reputation for tough anti-inflation policies.
Credibility theory of the EMS
– By fixing their currencies to the DM,the other EMS
countries in effect imported the German Bundesbank’s
credibility as an inflation fighter.
– Inflation rates in EMS countries tended to converge
around Germany’s generally low inflation rate.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-10Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Figure 20-2,Inflation Convergence Within Six Original EMS Members,
1978-2000
Slide 20-11Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The EU,1992” Initiative
The EU countries have tried to achieve greater internal
economic unity by:
– Fixing mutual exchange rates
– Direct measures to encourage the free flow of goods,
services,and factors of production
The process of market unification began when the original
EU members formed their customs union in 1957.
The Single European Act of 1986 provided for a free
movement of people,goods,services,and capital and
established many new policies.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-12Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
European Economic and Monetary Union
In 1989,the Delors report laid the foundations for the
single currency,the euro.
Economic and monetary union (EMU)
– A European Union in which national currencies are
replaced by a single EU currency managed by a sole
central bank that operates on behalf of all EU members.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-13Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Three stages of the Delors plan:
– All EU members were to join the EMS exchange rate
mechanism (ERM)
– Exchange rate margins were to be narrowed and certain
macroeconomic policy decisions placed under more
centralized EU control
– Replacement of national currencies by a single
European currency and vesting all monetary policy
decisions in a ESCB
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-14Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Maastricht Treaty (1991)
– It set out a blueprint for the transition process from the
EMS fixed exchange rate system to EMU.
– It specified a set of macroeconomic convergence criteria
that EU countries need to satisfy for admission to EMU.
– It included steps toward harmonizing social policy
within the EU and toward centralizing foreign and
defense policy decision.
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-15Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
EU countries moved away from the EMS and toward
the single shared currency for four reasons:
– Greater degree of European market integration
– Same opportunity as Germany to participate in system-
wide monetary decisions
– Complete freedom of capital movements
– Political stability of Europe
How the European
Single Currency Evolved
Slide 20-16Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
The Maastricht Convergence Criteria and the
Stability and Growth Pact
The Maastricht Treaty specifies that EU member
countries must satisfy several convergence criteria:
– Price stability
– Maximum inflation rate 1.5% above the average of the three
EU member states with lowest inflation
– Exchange rate stability
– Stable exchange rate within the ERM without devaluing on its
own initiative
– Budget discipline
– Maximum public-sector deficit 3% of the country’s GDP
– Maximum public debt 60% of the country’s GDP
Slide 20-17Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Figure 20-3,Behavior of the Euro’s Exchange Rates
Against Major Currencies
Slide 20-18Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
A Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) in 1997 sets up:
– The medium-term budgetary objective of positions close
to balance or in surplus
– A timetable for the imposition of financial penalties on
counties that fail to correct situations of,excessive”
deficits and debt promptly enough
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-19Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The European System of Central Banks
It consists of the European Central Bank in Frankfurt
plus 12 national central banks.
It conducts monetary policy for the euro zone.
It is dependent on politicians in two respects:
– The ESCB’s members are political appointments.
– The Maastricht Treaty leaves exchange rate policy for
the euro zone ultimately in the hands of the political
authorities.
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-20Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Revised Exchange Rate Mechanism
It defines broad exchange rate zones for EU countries
that are not yet members of EMU against the euro,
– It specifies reciprocal intervention arrangements to
support these target zones.
– It is referred to as ERM 2.
It was viewed necessary in order to,
– Discourage competitive devaluations against the euro by
EU members outside the euro zone
– Give would-be EMU entrants a way of satisfying the
exchange rate stability convergence criterion
The Euro and Economic
Policy in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-21Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Theory of optimum currency areas
It predicts that fixed exchange rates are most
appropriate for areas closely integrated through
international trade and factor movements.
Slide 20-22Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Economic Integration and the Benefits of a Fixed
Exchange Rate Area,GG Schedule
Monetary efficiency gain
– The joiner’s saving from avoiding the uncertainty,
confusion,and calculation and transaction costs that arise
when exchange rates float,
– It is higher,the higher the degree of economic integration
between the joining country and the fixed exchange rate
area.
GG schedule
– It shows how the potential gain of a country from joining
the euro zone depends on its trading link with that region.
– It slopes upward.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-23Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-4,The GG Schedule
Degree of economic integration between the
joining country and the exchange rate area
Monetary efficiency
gain for the joining country
GG
Slide 20-24Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Economic Integration and the Costs of a Fixed Exchange
Rate Area,The LL Schedule
Economic stability loss
– The economic stability loss that arises because a country that
joins an exchange rate area gives up its ability to use the
exchange rate and monetary policy for the purpose of
stabilizing output and employment.
– It is lower,the higher the degree of economic integration
between a country and the fixed exchange rate area that it joins.
LL schedule
– It shows the relationship of the country’s economic stability
loss from joining.
– It slopes downward.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-25Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-5,The LL Schedule
Degree of economic integration between the
joining country and the exchange rate area
Economic stability
loss for the joining country
LL
Slide 20-26Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Decision to Join a Currency Area,Putting the
GG and LL Schedules Together
The intersection of GG and LL
– Determines a critical level of economic integration
between a fixed exchange rate area and a country
– Shows how a country should decide whether to fix its
currency’s exchange rate against the euro
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-27Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-6,Deciding When to Peg the Exchange Rate
Degree of economic integration
between the joining country and
the exchange rate area
Gains and losses
for the joining country
LL
GG
Gains exceed
losses
Losses exceed
gains
1
1
Slide 20-28Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The GG-LL framework can be used to examine how
changes in a country’s economic environment affect
its willingness to peg its currency to an outside
currency area.
Figure 20-7 illustrates an increase in the size and
frequency of sudden shifts in the demand for the
country’s exports.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-29Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-7,An Increase in Output Market Variability
LL1
GG
LL2
2
2 Degree of economic integration
between the joining country and
the exchange rate area
Gains and losses
for the joining country
1
1
Slide 20-30Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
What Is an Optimum Currency Area?
It is a region where it is best (optimal) to have a single
currency.
Optimality depends on degree of economic integration:
– Trade in goods and services
– Factor mobility
A fixed exchange rate area will best serve the
economic interests of each of its members if the degree
of output and factor trade among them is high.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-31Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-8,Intra-EU Trade as a Percent of EU GDP
Slide 20-32Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Table 20-2,People Changing Region of Residence in 1986
(percent of total population)
B r i t a i n Fra n c e G e r m a n y I t a l y J a p a n U n i t e d S t a t e s
1,1 1,3 1,1 0,6 2,6 3,0
S o u r c e,O r g a n i z a t i o n f o r E c o n o m i c C o o p e r a t i o n a n d D e v e l o p m e n t,O E C D E m p l o y m e n t O u t l o o k,P a r i s,O E C D,
J u l y 1 9 9 0,T a b l e 3,3,
Slide 20-33Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Case Study,Is Europe an Optimum Currency
Area?
Europe is not an optimum currency area:
– Most EU countries export form 10% to 20% of their
output to other EU countries.
– EU-U.S,trade is only 2% of U.S,GNP.
– Labor is much more mobile within the U.S,than within
Europe.
– Federal transfers and changes in federal tax payments
provide a much bigger cushion for region-specific
shocks in the U.S,than do EU revenues and
expenditures.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Slide 20-34Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Theory of
Optimum Currency Areas
Figure 20-9,Divergent Inflation in the Euro Zone
Slide 20-35Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
The Future of EMU
If EMU succeeds it will promote European political as
well as economic integration.
If EMU fails the goal of European political unification
will be set back.
Problems that the EMU will face in the coming years:
Europe is not an optimum currency area.
Economic union is so far in front of political union.
EU labor markets are very rigid.
SGP constrains fiscal policies.
Slide 20-36Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Summary
Fixed exchange rates in Europe were a by-product of
the Bretton Woods system.
The EMS of fixed intra-EU exchange rates was
inaugurated in March 1979.
In practice all EMS currencies were pegged to the
DM.
On January 1,1999,11 EU countries initiated an
EMU by adopting a common currency,the euro.
Greece became the 12th member two years later.
Slide 20-37Copyright? 2003 Pearson Education,Inc.
Summary
The Maastricht Treaty specified a set of
macroeconomic convergence criteria that EU countries
would need to satisfy to qualify for admission to EMU.
The theory of optimum currency areas implies that
countries will wish to join fixed exchange rate areas
closely linked to their own economies through trade and
factor mobility.
The EU does not appear to satisfy all of the criteria for
an optimum currency area.
