12.1 Introduction Quality is an essential feature that will lead the consumer to select or not any food product. With numerous food scares that have hit the food market in the UK and Europe (E. coli, BSE, genetically modified organisms-based products, dioxins in animal feed in Belgium) consumers have become much more aware and therefore selective in their choice to food. Quality takes many aspects from safety to nutrition, sensory characteristics to service qualities. Consumers integrate these concepts to decide which product to buy according to their own criteria. A safe product is an essential requirement but will never suffice to sell a product. Consumers want an attractive product in terms of organoleptic properties at a price they consider appropriate. It should satisfy their needs in terms of service provided (e.g. convenience, ease of opening) and more and more related to specific nutritional needs (vitamins, functional ingredients, low calories, low salt). In summary, quality is the combination of features in a product which ensure customer satisfaction. From this definition of quality, it can be seen that customers will repeat the purchase of a chilled product if they are satisfied by its sensory quality, in one word if they are pleasurable to eat. Our senses are extremely sensitive and sophisticated to scrutinise our outside world. For example, our sense of smell, although not as sensitive as some other animal species, can detect hundreds of different odours. The topic of the first and second sections will give an overview of the way we measure quality of chilled products using our senses. It will also show how using a pool of people trained in the detection and description of sensory qualities will give the ability to product developers and quality managers to develop the best product, every time. However, understanding 12 Quality and consumer acceptability S. R. P. R. Durand, HP Foods Ltd quality using trained people will only tell you one side of the story; how is a chilled product characterised? In an increasingly competitive market, food manufacturers have realised the need to ask their existing and potential customers what they like and dislike through preference tests. This will form the second side of the story and the section dedicated to consumer acceptability will provide an exhaustive list of preference tests used to understand liking patterns. The final section will focus on combining these two sets of information, subjective and objective, to develop consumer-driven specifications that will fulfil their expectations. 12.2 What defines sensory quality? The sensory quality of a product can be divided into its appearance, smell, texture, flavour and also aftertaste. 12.2.1 Appearance The appearance of a product is the first assessment that a consumer will undertake to define the quality of a chilled product. Many aspects of the visual component of a food product can be used to assess its quality. The size, the shape, the distribution of pieces, the surface texture, the colour and the brightness are all determining factors to assess freshness and overall quality expectation. The dullness or sheen of the surface in red meat combined with the redness of the flesh are used by consumers to assess the freshness of meat products in supermarkets. In return, supermarkets use lighting and in some instance spraying a thin layer of water to improve the visual quality of meat behind counters. The appearance can be divided into optical and visual structure components. The optical appearance is mainly related to colour, gloss and translucency. The visual structure is linked to the texture of the product, including particle size, smoothness and surface texture. Colour is probably the first and main characteristic that a customer will use to judge the quality of a chilled product, as the deterioration of food is often linked to a colour change (Piggott 1988). Colour is also involved with a psychological dimension; red is associated with power, orange and yellow with excitement and cheerfulness. The food industry is therefore spending a considerable amount of resources on eye-catching properties. In particular, farmed salmon are fed with carotenoids to give them a pink/orange colour, further enhanced when smoked, which is considered to be a sign of quality and freshness in the mind of the consumer. 12.2.2 Odour: type, intensity The smell of chilled food gives a good indication of the freshness and quality. An odour is detected when volatiles are inhaled into the nasal cavity and make contact with the olfactory system. Our smelling system is more modest equipment than our vision system, detecting only 10,000 odours with 5 million 342 Chilled foods receptors, versus millions of colours with more than 100 million receptors (Meilgaard et al. 1987). It is however highly efficient in the detection of spoilage, off-odours or taint and often more sensitive and accurate than many sophisticated instruments. When cutting a piece of meat or fish, the level of freshness can be assessed by smell. Jorgensen et al. (1988) has shown a strong relationship between the detection of malodorous volatiles and the spoilage of chilled fish during shelf-life as detected by a pool of trained people. 12.2.3 Flavour Flavour is possibly the essential sensory component used to measure the quality of chilled products. If the flavour is undesirable or does not correspond to expectations, the product will be rejected. Flavour is defined as the sum of perceptions perceived in the mouth in the back of the throat and the nose via the retro-nasal route (Piggott 1988). Flavour includes the primary tastes (salty, sweet, acidic and bitter) caused by soluble substances, sensation factors such as astringency, heat or cooling effects and the aroma perception caused by volatile substances. Quality criteria associated with flavour relate to the expression of an expected flavour and the intensity of it. 12.2.4 Texture Texture can be defined as the sensory perception on the physical structure of a food product. During the handling and preparation of food, texture properties can be measured by visual evaluation and touch to identify its overall quality. A hard cheese over matured will look dry with a sensation of mouthdrying and roughness in the mouth. Cheese makers use an agreed methodology to define the quality of cheese in relation to its texture characteristics. Texture is a complex area of the evaluation of sensory quality, as described and classified in reviews by Bourne (1982) or Civille and Liska (1975). There are three different texture characteristics. 1. The mechanical dimension is related to the reaction of the food to stress, such as hardness, firmness, cohesiveness or chewiness, as measured by the muscles of the hand, fingers, lips, tongue or jaw. 2. The geometrical dimension is related to the arrangement of the physical components of a product such as size, shape, fibrousness, particles or lumps. 3. The surface dimension is related to the moisture and fat content of a product and how they are released during a chewing process. A large part of enjoying a meat product involves its texture quality and consumers are well aware of words such as tenderness, chewiness or toughness. Slaughtering methods and storage conditions have an influence on the texture quality of fresh fish as described by Love (1988). For pastry-based products such as quiche or pizza, texture is the criterion that influences and therefore best Quality and consumer acceptability 343 predicts its quality. The pastry tends to adsorb moistness from the other components to become soggy prior to any development of off-flavour. 12.3 Sensory evaluation techniques From the previous section, it is obvious that any test to measure quality of chilled food should involve the use of human subjects. Sensory evaluation is a scientific discipline involved with the measure, study and interpretation of responses to food properties as perceived by the senses of sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing (IFT 1975). Sensory assessment is done either by a small pool of people (typically 8 to 30 people) who have received some training, known as ‘objective testing’ or by a larger pool of consumers who give their own opinion on a product or range of products without any prior training. This is known as ‘subjective testing’. The objective and hypotheses defined in any project brief will determine the choice of the type of evaluation to be performed, and the type of panel, the test and the overall design of the experiment. Carpenter et al. (2000) defines in detail the criteria to consider. Objective testing is carried out by qualified and trained people and can be used for discriminating and describing differences between chilled products. This pool of people, or sensory panel, can be employees of a company or a dedicated workforce. After initial recruitment to measure any sensory impairment such as anosmia (impairment in the sense of smell) or ageusia (impairment in the sense of taste), the panel members take part in an extensive and gradually more difficult training schedule in order to describe, discriminate and evaluate any subtle differences between the products under investigation. Many sensory professionals have published training schedules for general training sessions (Jellinek 1985) to more specific and precise sensory programmes (Civille and Szczesniak 1975). Tests used to characterise food properties by sensory experts can be either discriminative or descriptive. 12.3.1 Discriminative tests These types of tests are used when it is required to identify if any difference exists between two or more products. It might be required to change an ingredient supplier for cost reduction or quality reasons and the brief is to confirm that the overall flavour, texture or appearance is not affected. It is more cost effective to ask a highly trained panel of experts in their field to assess any difference rather than asking consumers. The tests are very sensitive to any sensory variation as they involve a direct comparison. The triangle test is the most commonly used discriminative test. In this test, panellists are given three samples, in a pre-determined order, one is different from the other two. They are asked to identify the odd sample (BS 5929: part 5, 1988). For example, a ham manufacturer might want to assess the effectiveness of a controlled atmosphere packaging against a present system without changing the overall sensory 344 Chilled foods properties over time. The test sensitivity can allow expensive capital expenditure requirements to be made with a high level of confidence. When more than two products are compared, ranking tests or multiple comparison tests are used. Typically, a ranking test is used when no control is available or required and assessors are asked to rank products in order of intensity for a specific sensory characteristic. A multiple comparison test is used when a control sample is used as an anchor point and assessors are asked to evaluate the intensity of the difference if any. Other tests might be required from time to time to evaluate the sensitivity of specific compounds and/or chemicals. These tests are important in taint evaluation or the detection of materials difficult to assess. Threshold tests are used to detect at which concentration level, a compound can be detected. Dilution technique determines the smallest amount of compound that can be detected in a product. Gillette et al. (1984) use this technique to assess the level of heat in red peppers. 12.3.2 Descriptive tests These tests are used to identify sensory characteristics of a chilled product and to quantify them. Panellists are selected on their ability to describe and discriminate between samples. They are presented with variants of the product and asked to describe them. After a period dedicated to confirm and define agreed terms and scale, the panel is then presented with the samples, one at a time and asked to give a score. Stone et al. (1974) has described in detail one of these descriptive techniques called ‘quantitative descriptive analysis’. Results are analysed by means of univariate and multivariate analyses. Analysis of variance (O’Mahony 1986) is used to measure any difference between samples for each attribute. Principal component analysis is a technique used to reduce the amount of dimension or sensory terms into a manageable format, usually two or three dimensions. Procustes analysis is mainly used for the assessment of individuals’ performance and efficiency (Arnold and Williams 1986). Graphs are often used to summarise the results into condensed and meaningful information. Spider graphs (see Fig. 12.1), give a general overview of sensory differences by the overall shape of each product, providing an individual product fingerprint. Other sensory techniques have emerged in recent years in the evaluation of food quality by sensory evaluation. In particular, the time-intensity technique takes into consideration the temporal dimension of tasting behaviour (Cliff et al., 1993). This technique is particularly interesting for the assessment of spicy products or for primary taste evaluation, such as sweet sensation in artificially sweetened drinks and is used by Matysiak and Noble (1991). Figure 12.1 shows an overview of how four samples of chilled smoked salmon differ in sensory terms from one another, using a spider graph. For each attribute, the samples are more intense away from the centre. In particular, salmon D had a more orangy colour and sample F had the least moist surface. Sample I was the least salty and smoky product. Quality and consumer acceptability 345 12.3.3 Use of a trained panel for measurement of sensory quality Taint and off-flavours In foods these are a major threat to manufacturers and retailers, as it can become extremely damaging and costly. A tainted product reaching the consumer can create problems for the food producer or retailer much more damaging than the complaint itself. Direct costs such as loss of production, cleaning of factory, damaged commercial relationships between suppliers, manufacturers and retailers (e.g. de-listing by retailers), litigation proceedings and even factory shutdown may occur. Other more substantial financial implications may arise, such as loss of customer goodwill and damaged brand image may manifest themselves through lower sales and loss of market share. Taint and off-flavours are caused by the presence of a chemical at very low concentration in a food product, usually a volatile organic compound, which imparts a flavour unacceptable to the consumer. Taint is an unpleasant odour or flavour imparted to food through external sources and off-flavour (or off-odour) is an unpleasant flavour (or odour) to food through internal changes, such as enzymatic or microbial activities. Unlimited sources of taint and off-flavours exist making it extremely difficult for manufacturers or retailers to control. Raw materials, packaging materials, factory environment (e.g. flooring, paint, cleaning agents), microbial spoilage are all known sources of taint and off-flavour. Water can also be a major source of contamination. It may contain chlorophenols or chloroanisol; this accounts for the largest number of known cases of taint. Sensory evaluation coupled with the use of sophisticated apparatus such as Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GCMS) is required to evaluate and identify the taint and its source. Such a combination was used by Farmer et al. (1995) to evaluate off-flavours in wild and farmed Atlantic salmon. The author found that the main difference was between wild salmon caught in rivers and those from the sea rather than between wild and farmed salmon. River-caught Fig. 12.1 Differences in sensory profile between four different chilled smoked salmon. 346 Chilled foods wild salmon showed enhanced earthy flavour and odour notes, with 2- methylisoborneol and geosmin being the major compounds involved. Sensory monitoring of quality The quality of chilled products should be consistent during production and food companies are using various techniques to ensure food quality conformity. These techniques have a common ground in that one or more parameters are measured against an agreed quality specification. For example, pH, salt or sugar levels might be measured to ensure no drift to the final composition of a product. These measurements, although important in their own right, will not allow the definition of flavour characteristic or texture quality. Sensory evaluation is therefore used to ensure integrity of a series of set quality parameters. The stages involved in setting up such routine sensory quality monitoring include the establishment of a product standard that represents the customer requirements. The product standard is translated into key sensory characteristics. The second stage involves the definition of acceptance ranges for each parameter, taking into account commercial risks against consumer loyalty. In the case of sensory quality assessment, a panel is selected and trained to recognise products that fall within and outside the acceptable range for each sensory parameter. It is essential that employees involved are committed to quality and that more than one assessor is used for each assessment to ensure precision and reliability. Standard procedures are set up and may include go/no-go quality rating or grading such as the CCFRA frozen and canned products specification (Rodway et al. 1999), difference test or more precise but lengthy descriptive analysis. A specification sheet that includes acceptance ranges (Table 12.1) and a quality monitoring chart for a flavour parameter (Fig. 12.2) are provided as an example for the assessment of the quality of a chilled apple pie. The members of a panel are asked individually to assess each sample for each attribute using a 10-point scale, from not present to very strong. A consensus score or mean score is then entered into the collation sheet showing the non-acceptable range for each attribute (shaded areas). One or more scores outside the non-shaded area indicate a product that does not meet quality criteria and further investigation is required to confirm the findings. Figure 12.2 displays the trend of the change of strength of flavour characteristic for a chilled apple pie product over a production time span of six months. For each production batch evaluated, a score outside the two specification limits is considered as unacceptable. The strength of flavour varies considerably over this production period and an investigation should be organised to understand reasons for this variability and how to correct it. Storage effect/definition of shelf-life Shelf-life of chilled products can be defined as the period between manufacture and consumption during which the product is in an acceptable condition, both in Quality and consumer acceptability 347 terms of safety and quality. During storage, a chilled product will undergo changes linked to chemical, microbiological and physical reactions. It has been shown that for many products, sensory evaluation has proven to be the most sensitive technique to assess these changes. Similar techniques to those described for quality monitoring can be applied to sensory shelf-life evaluation. Claasen and Lawless (1992) found that sensory analysis by descriptive technique to measure the end of life of liquid milk was more sensitive than more traditional analytical techniques. Table 12.1 Specification sheet for collation of data for flavour and texture of chilled apple pie Flavour 0 123456789 Strength of apple Sweetness Acidic Oily/fatty pastry Off-flavours Texture Doughiness of pastry Crispness of apple Greasy mouthfeel Fig. 12.2 Quality monitoring over a six month period for strength of flavour of a chilled apple pie. 348 Chilled foods Strength apple flavor Upper specification Lower specification 12.4 Determining consumer acceptability There is no doubt that the taste of food is an essential criterion for the acceptability of a product by the consumer. The best marketing and advertising campaign for a new chilled product might convince a consumer to buy it for the first time. However, should this product not attain expected values, the consumer will not purchase the product again. Although taste undoubtedly plays an important part in food choice, it is not the only essential element. Attitudes, belief, nutritional awareness, brand and image, convenience, price and other socio-cultural aspects (e.g. religion, education) are all important criteria the market researcher will take into account. Although expert sensory panels are useful to understand the sensory properties of a chilled product, when consumer acceptability and behaviour is concerned, tests involving consumers must take place. 12.4.1 On-site trials for screening purposes These tests are used by many food companies to assess the sensory quality of their products, including products under development versus competitors’ ones. These tests are very useful for the screening of several samples prior to a full- scale assessment, in order to reduce costs and optimise tight deadlines. A minimum number of consumers are required in order to be confident of the result. It is advisable to involve at least 50 employees. The main negative aspect to this type of assessment is the knowledge employees have acquired working in contact with the product and inevitably biases may occur in their choice. The researcher should minimise these biases hiding recognisable clues when possible. 12.4.2 Home placement tests These tests imply that consumers are asked to try and assess one or more products while at home. The advantage is that the assessment is carried out within a normal life situation and is therefore more likely to represent the true behaviour and liking for a product. It also has the advantage of getting an opinion from the whole family rather than just one individual. However, the drawback is that the control of the response is poor. In particular, different cooking procedures and processes may be used by different consumers, making a direct comparison more complicated. Also, when two or more products are assessed, the cooking procedure between products or the time interval between cooking and eating may differ. In a home location test, samples may be delivered to homes or collected at a central location. After a certain period, the researcher will interview the consumer by phone or face-to-face by calling in. Questions such as liking for each product by each member of the household, type of cooking and serving, expectation, likelihood of purchase may be asked. Quality and consumer acceptability 349 12.4.3 Central location or hall tests When a consumer test must be controlled more closely, or the number of products exceeds two or three, a central location test in busy town centres is preferred. Interviewers stop potential participants and ask specific questions to ensure that they meet agreed criteria, i.e. that they fall within set quotas and to ensure their willingness to participate. This test tends to be preferred by food companies for being cheaper to run than home location tests. Hedonic scales are usually used to measure liking of products. Consumers are asked their liking for each product and also the preferred sample overall. The objective of the research will dictate the type of samples to be assessed and the questions asked. 12.4.4 Food choice and attitude The above techniques all use hedonic scales that mainly reflect the preference for the product. However, when one is interested in the reasons for choosing certain foods, it is important to encompass other components to determine attitude towards foods. In particular, the cognitive and intention components. Many researchers have tried to incorporate more than one factor to explain what dictates choice. When consumers want to treat themselves to a high-quality piece of meat, they may be more inclined to go to a local butcher and select, often after discussion and advice, a quality sirloin steak. The experience of buying and the context in which it is carried out becomes an integral part of the decision process and choice. Lange (1999) studied how name and packaging information could affect orange juice liking under economical constraint. The author observed differences between hedonic responses under blind conditions when various information and economical constraints were given. Other researchers have investigated the influence of health and nutrition information on liking (Ka¨hko¨nen and Tuorila 1995). Contextual analysis has been extensively studied by Schutz (1994) to identify how, when, where and by whom specific food products are eaten. 12.4.5 Qualitative research Qualitative research is carried out when the objective of the study is to understand behaviour and attitude rather than preference, although a combination of both is often considered. Focus groups and individual interviews are two types of qualitative techniques. In a focus group test, eight to ten consumers are recruited and asked to participate in a discussion around a specific topic. To manage such a group, a moderator is used who leads the discussion using specific elicitation techniques to gain information related to the topic. In particular, it is useful to use open-ended questions and probing questions to get the most useful information from the group. A carefully prepared questioning plan is used by the moderator to guide the discussion towards the main areas of interest. In a recent study, a focus group technique was used to investigate whether a new concept of pre-cooked bacon would succeed in the market-place. Reactions 350 Chilled foods to the idea, the product and various packaging formats formed the basis of the question guide. Convenience and healthiness were found to be the main aspects that would attract the consumer to this new concept. In particular, the issue was not whether bacon was healthy but rather the cooking method used, e.g. frying ...‘anything’s bad if you fry it’. Also, a microwavable bacon that would retain its sensory characteristics, i.e. crispness, was appealing to the housewives in particular.‘I spend half my time in the kitchen and I think that’s wonderful’. Individual interviews are used when topics are more sensitive or when no group interaction is either wanted or needed. Various elicitation techniques are used, often similar to those used for focus groups. One technique that is used mainly in an interview environment is the Repertory Grid Method. Objects under study are arranged into groups of three, such that each object appears at least once and one object is carried over to the next trio. Two of these three objects are similar according to the criterion defined by the researcher and different from the last object. Each interviewee is asked to describe how one object differs from the other two. Scaling has sometimes been used to assess the level of difference or similarity for each consumer and each descriptor (Gains 1994). 12.5 Future trends and conclusion Better understanding of consumer needs and expectations is an essential aspect to build consumer loyalty and generate new custom. This chapter has shown that both sensory and consumer assessments are required to fully understand consumer behaviour. It has recently emerged from researchers and also food companies that the use of an integrated approach to product quality and new product development lead to sustainable market success. Consumer-driven specification becomes very much a current trend in the food industry. After years of production-driven specification, food companies have realised that customer complaints increase while loyalty does not. The potential of consumer input into the development of food quality specifications has been described by McEwan (1999) to relate sensory characteristics (as defined by a trained panel) and the acceptability range as defined by the consumer. The research involved canned grapefruit, and it was shown that the main deterrent to quality acceptability was found to be any physical defect that was perceived to have a negative effect on the texture and flavour. On the other hand, ragged edges and broken segments were thought to have less adverse effects than previously thought by the industry. Bech et al. (1997) has put in place an overall consumer- driven quality tool, House of Quality, where consumer needs are translated into measurable sensory attributes using frozen peas as a vehicle for the demonstration. These principles can be applied to chilled foods. Consumer integration at an early stage of product development is becoming widely spread amongst food manufacturers, reducing time and cost, often related to product failure when rejected at first glance by the consumer. In the UK, it is Quality and consumer acceptability 351 estimated that 90% of new products introduced to the market each year will be de-listed from the retailers after six months on the shelves. New and exciting techniques have seen great potential in recent years. In particular, preference mapping used to relate sensory data to consumer acceptability has proved very useful to both marketing and product development teams alike (Risvik et al. 1997). This technique allows researchers to focus more closely to the optimum product from a sensory point of view as defined by the consumer. Major food scares have had in recent years a huge and detrimental effect on food acceptability, and in particular beef and GMO-related products. Consumers have made their voice heard and this has resulted in major and essential policies developed by governments. Food manufacturers have realised the importance of understanding consumer behaviour better and identifying the mechanisms for food choice and acceptability. Traceability is becoming a very hot topic for food manufacturers and retailers. The integration of total quality systems and closer control is being put in place in ever growing international and complex markets (see Chapter 15). 12.6 References ARNOLD G M and WILLIAMS A A, ‘The use of Generalised Procustes Techniques in Sensory Analysis’,inStatistical Procedures in Food Research, Piggott J R, 1986, Elsevier Applied science, London. BECH A C, HANSEN M and WIENBERG L, (1997) ‘Application of House of Quality in Translation of Consumer Needs into Sensory Attributes Measurable by Descriptive Sensory Analysis’, Food Quality and Preference, 8 (5/6) 329– 48. BOURNE M, (1982) Food Texture and Viscosity, Academic Press, London. BSI, ‘Methods for Sensory Analysis of Foods: Part 5: Triangle Test’, BS 5929, 1988. CARPENTER R P, LYON D H and HASDELL T A, (2000) Guidelines for Sensory Analysis in Food Product Development and Quality Control, Aspen Publishers Inc., Maryland. CIVILLE G and SZCZESNIAK A S, (1975) ‘Guidelines to Training a Texture Profile Panel’, Journal of Texture Studies, 4 204–23. CIVILLE G and LISKA I H, (1975) ‘Modifications and Applications to Foods of the General Foods Sensory Texture Profile Technique’, Journal of Texture Studies, 6 19–31. CLAASEN M and LAWLESS H T, (1992) ‘Comparison of Descriptive Terminology Systems for Sensory Evaluation of Fluid Milk’, Journal of Food Science, 57 596–601. CLIFF M and HEYMANN H, (1993) ‘Development and Use of Time-Intensity Methodology for Sensory Evaluation: a Review’, Food Research Interna- tional, 26 375–85. FARMER L J, MCCONNELL J M, HAGAN T D J and HARPER D B, (1995) ‘Flavour and 352 Chilled foods Off-Flavour in Wild and farmed Atlantic Salmon from Locations around Northern Ireland’, Water Science and Technology, 31 (11) 259–64. GAINS N, ‘The Repertory Grid Approach’, pp. 50–76, in Measurement of Food Preferences, ed. by MacFie H J H and Thomson D M H, 1994, Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, Glasgow. GILLETTE M H, APPEL C E and LEGO M C, (1984) ’A new Method for Sensory Evaluation of Red Pepper Heat’, Journal of Food Science, 49 (4) 1028–33. INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS, (1975) ‘Shelf-life of Foods’, Food Technology in Australia, 27 (8) 315–19. JELLINEK G, (1985) Sensory Evaluation of Food: Theory and practice, Ellis Horwood, Chichester. JORGENSEN B R, GIBSON D M and HUSS H H, (1988) ‘Microbiological Quality and Shelf-life Prediction of Chilled Fish’, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 6 295–307. KA ¨ HKO ¨ NEN P and TUORILA H, (1995) ‘The Role of Expectations and Information in Sensory Perception of Low-Fat and Regular Fat Sausages’, Appetite, 24 298–9. LANGE C, ROUSSEAU F and ISSANCHOU S, (1999) ‘Expectations Liking and Purchase Behaviour under Economical Constraint’, Food Quality and Preference, 10 31–9. LOVE R M, 1988, The Food Fishes, Their Intrinsic Variation and Practical Implications, Farrand Press, London. MATYSIAK N L and NOBLE A C, (1991) ‘Comparison of Temporal Perception of Fruitiness in Model Systems Sweetened with Aspartame, and Aspartame- Acesulfame K Blend or Sucrose’, Journal of Food science, 56 (3) 823–6. MCEWAN J A, (1999) Consumer Input into the Development of Food Quality Specifications, personal communication. MEILGAARD M, CIVILLE G V and CARR B T, (1987) Sensory Evaluation techniques, Vols I and II, CRC Press, Florida. PIGGOTT J R, (1988) Sensory Analysis of Foods, Elsevier Applied Science, London. O’MAHONY M, (1986) Sensory Evaluation of Food, Statistical Methods and Procedures, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. RISVIK E, MCEWAN J A and RODBOTTEN M, (1997) ‘Evaluation of Sensory Profiling and Projective Mapping Data’, Food Quality and Preference, 8 (1) 63–71. RODWAY E C and THE QUICK FROZEN SPECIFICATION WORKING PARTY, (1999) ‘Quick Roasting Potatoes’, Campden Food Specification: L100. Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association, UK. SCHUTZ H G, (1994) ‘Appropriateness as Measure of the Cognitive Contextual Aspects of Food Acceptance, pp. 25–50, in Measurement of Food Preferences, ed. by MacFie H J H and Thomson D M H , Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, Glasgow. STONE H, SIDEL J, OLIVER S, WOOLSEY A and SINGLETON R C, (1974) ‘Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis’, Food Technology, 28 (11) 24, 26, 28–29, 32, 34. Quality and consumer acceptability 353